🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."